国产一精品一AV一免费,亚洲成AV人片不卡无码,AV永久天堂一区二区三区,国产激情久久久久影院

最新文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

熱讀文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

當(dāng)期雜志
訂閱
雜志紙刊
網(wǎng)站
移動(dòng)訂閱
--
--
--
高盛高管高調(diào)出走內(nèi)幕
 作者: Stephen Gandel    時(shí)間: 2012年03月16日    來(lái)源: 財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:         
字體 [   ]        
打印        
發(fā)表評(píng)論        

高盛變了,但并不是像它離職的員工所說(shuō)的那樣。
轉(zhuǎn)貼到: 微信 新浪微博 關(guān)注騰訊微博 人人網(wǎng) 豆瓣

????格雷格?史密斯最近刊登在《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》(New York Times)專欄版上那篇轟動(dòng)一時(shí)的文章痛斥了高盛(Goldman Sachs)的貪婪本性,但這并不是什么新鮮事,這些年來(lái)很多人都一直都在這么說(shuō)。我最大的疑惑是“他為什么選在現(xiàn)在這個(gè)節(jié)骨眼開(kāi)口?”(當(dāng)然,可能是因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在史密斯的獎(jiǎng)金已經(jīng)到手了。)

????高盛被冠以“吸血鬼烏賊”(vampire squid)的稱號(hào)之前,很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間以來(lái)坊間一直盛傳高盛為了賺一塊錢,都可以把客戶的眼珠子挖出來(lái)。不信?差不多兩年前,美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)(Securities and Exchange Commission)根據(jù)按揭債券Abacus對(duì)高盛的指控明明白白地顯示,高盛會(huì)犧牲一部分客戶的利益,達(dá)到為其他客戶和高盛自己賺錢的目的。任何高盛交易員稱之為 “不穩(wěn)定”的交易,高盛總部的人絕不會(huì)參與。

????那么,究竟發(fā)生了什么事,終于讓格雷格?史密斯拍案而起,開(kāi)始對(duì)高盛開(kāi)炮,甚至不惜搭上自己在華爾街的職業(yè)生涯?我給華爾街人士打電話詢問(wèn)有關(guān)史密斯高調(diào)“離開(kāi)”高盛一事時(shí)提出了這個(gè)問(wèn)題。大多數(shù)受訪者稱,他們已經(jīng)看了那篇文章,所有人都在議論這件事,接到我的電話也不奇怪。公平起見(jiàn),很多人都不同意史密斯的觀點(diǎn)。對(duì)沖基金經(jīng)理惠特尼?托爾森稱,他是高盛的客戶,他對(duì)高盛的服務(wù)“非常滿意”。我采訪的另一個(gè)人了解高盛近期進(jìn)行的、長(zhǎng)達(dá)一年的內(nèi)部調(diào)查,此人表示沒(méi)有任何證據(jù)表明,高盛員工一貫將公司利益凌駕于客戶之上。

????不過(guò),我得到的最好回答是高盛的確變了,但不是像史密斯所說(shuō)的那樣。過(guò)去幾年里,高盛開(kāi)始越來(lái)越多地啟用外來(lái)者填補(bǔ)職位空缺。最突出的例子是大衛(wèi)?所羅門,他的職業(yè)生涯始于貝爾斯登(Bear Stearns),如今已升至高盛投資銀行部門的聯(lián)席負(fù)責(zé)人,而且有傳言稱他是勞埃德?布蘭克費(fèi)恩職位的有力競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者。十年前,史密斯進(jìn)入高盛時(shí),像這樣的職位只能屬于高盛的嫡系部隊(duì),就像史密斯這樣從實(shí)習(xí)生一步步爬上來(lái)的人。

????金融危機(jī)之后,有報(bào)道稱高盛的交易員和投資銀行家之間文化沖突不斷。這些投資銀行家為了自身利益,一直謀求用自己的人取代布蘭克費(fèi)恩。迄今為止,主要來(lái)自交易部門的布蘭克費(fèi)恩和他的副手們一直占據(jù)著上風(fēng)。但事實(shí)上,還有第二種文化沖突,存在于那些從高盛起步并預(yù)計(jì)將在高盛養(yǎng)老的人以及半路才加盟的之間。過(guò)去,這種沖突可能影響不大。因?yàn)槟菚r(shí)候,高盛有大把的機(jī)會(huì),財(cái)源滾滾。但如今,投資銀行的利潤(rùn)減少。多德-弗蘭克法案和其對(duì)自營(yíng)交易的打擊意味著,高盛過(guò)去賺錢的很多方式已經(jīng)成為過(guò)去。因此,越來(lái)越多像格雷格?史密斯這樣的員工將被他們?cè)?jīng)熱愛(ài)的公司拋棄。

????當(dāng)然,這并不是說(shuō)高盛不曾像“操縱木偶”一樣對(duì)待客戶,把公司最差的交易硬塞給客戶,還要收取傭金。變化是,高盛這家公司不再有太多空間留給史密斯這樣的人了。

????譯者:早稻米

????The biggest question I have when it comes to the now famous New York Times Greg Smith Op-ed where he accuses Goldman Sachs (GS) of doing what everyone else has been saying about the firm for years is "Why now?" (Besides, of course, the fact that he probably recently cashed his bonus check.)

????Well before Goldman was called a vampire squid, it's been long understood that Goldman would "rip the eyeballs" out of its clients in order to make a buck. And if you had any doubts, nearly two years ago the Securities and Exchange Commission's case against Goldman based on the mortgage bond Abacus made it clear that the firm will sacrifice some clients in order to make money for others and Goldman itself. When Goldman traders call something a sh**y deal, the people they are going to get to step in it don't work at GS HQ.

????So the question is what has finally gotten Greg Smith fed up enough to blaze the firm and most likely his Wall Street career today? That's the question I posed to Wall Streeters today when I called to ask about the Smith public "outing"of Goldman. Most of the people called said they had read the Op-ed. Everyone said it was the thing people are talking about. No one was surprised I was calling. And to be fair a number of the people didn't agree with Smith. Hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson said that he is a client of Goldman and has been "universally pleased" with his experience. Another person I talked to with knowledge of Goldman's recent year-long internal investigation produced no evidence of the firm's employees routinely putting Goldman's interests ahead of its clients.

????Still, the best answer I got was that things have indeed changed at Wall Street but not in the way Smith explains. For the past few years Goldman has been filing more and more of its positions with people who started their careers elsewhere. The most prominent example of this is David Solomon, who started his career at Bear Stearns and has risen to be the co-head of investment banking at Goldman, and a rumored contender for CEO Lloyd Blankfein's job. A decade ago when Smith started, a position like that would have gone to a Goldman lifer, a person like Smith, who had started at Goldman as an intern and work his way up.

????In the wake of the financial crisis, there had reportedly been a culture clash going on at Goldman between traders and investment bankers. The I-bankers have been angling for one their own to replace Blankfein. So far it appears that Blankfein and his lieutenants, who mostly come from the world of traders, have been winning. But there is actually a second culture clash going on. And that is between the people who have been at Goldman their entire careers and expected to be at the firm their entire careers and the people who have more recently showed up. In the past that may not have mattered. There was a lot of opportunity at Goldman and a lot of profits to go around. But there are less profits in investment banking these days. And Dodd-Frank and its crackdown on proprietary trading means that much of Goldman used to do to make money is going away. As a result, more Greg Smiths are going to be scorned by a firm they formerly loved.

????That's not to say that Goldman doesn't treat its clients like "muppets," jamming their mouth's open, force feeding them the firm's worst deals and getting them to hand over commissions for doing so. But what has also changed is that Goldman is no longer a firm that has room for as many Smiths as it once was.







更多




最佳評(píng)論

@關(guān)子臨: 自信也許會(huì)壓倒聰明,演技的好壞也許會(huì)壓倒腦力的強(qiáng)弱,好領(lǐng)導(dǎo)就是循循善誘的人,不獨(dú)裁,而有見(jiàn)地,能讓人心悅誠(chéng)服。    參加討論>>
@DuoDuopa:彼得原理,是美國(guó)學(xué)者勞倫斯彼得在對(duì)組織中人員晉升的相關(guān)現(xiàn)象研究后得出的一個(gè)結(jié)論:在各種組織中,由于習(xí)慣于對(duì)在某個(gè)等級(jí)上稱職的人員進(jìn)行晉升提拔,因而雇員總是趨向于晉升到其不稱職的地位。    參加討論>>
@Bruce的森林:正念,應(yīng)該可以解釋為專注當(dāng)下的事情,而不去想過(guò)去這件事是怎么做的,這件事將來(lái)會(huì)怎樣。一方面,這種理念可以幫助員工排除雜念,把注意力集中在工作本身,減少壓力,提高創(chuàng)造力。另一方面,這不失為提高員工工作效率的好方法??赡芎笳呤歉鞔驜OSS們更看重的吧。    參加討論>>


Copyright ? 2012財(cái)富出版社有限公司。 版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)書(shū)面許可,任何機(jī)構(gòu)不得全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)載。
《財(cái)富》(中文版)及網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容的版權(quán)屬于時(shí)代公司(Time Inc.),并經(jīng)過(guò)時(shí)代公司許可由香港中詢有限公司出版和發(fā)布。
深入財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)

雜志

·   當(dāng)期雜志
·   申請(qǐng)雜志贈(zèng)閱
·   特約專刊
·   廣告商

活動(dòng)

·   科技頭腦風(fēng)暴
·   2013財(cái)富全球論壇
·   財(cái)富CEO峰會(huì)

關(guān)于我們

·   公司介紹
·   訂閱查詢
·   版權(quán)聲明
·   隱私政策
·   廣告業(yè)務(wù)
·   合作伙伴
行業(yè)

·   能源
·   醫(yī)藥
·   航空和運(yùn)輸
·   傳媒與文化
·   工業(yè)與采礦
·   房地產(chǎn)
·   汽車
·   消費(fèi)品
·   金融
·   科技
頻道

·   管理
·   技術(shù)
·   商業(yè)
·   理財(cái)
·   職場(chǎng)
·   生活
·   視頻
·   博客

工具

·     微博
·     社區(qū)
·     RSS訂閱
內(nèi)容精華

·   500強(qiáng)
·   專欄
·   封面報(bào)道
·   創(chuàng)業(yè)
·   特寫(xiě)
·   前沿
·   CEO訪談
博客

·   四不像
·   劉聰
·   東8時(shí)區(qū)
·   章勱聞
·   公司治理觀察
·   東山豹尉
·   山??纯?/font>
·   明心堂主
榜單

·   世界500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   中國(guó)500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   美國(guó)500強(qiáng)
·   最受贊賞的中國(guó)公司
·   中國(guó)5大適宜退休的城市
·   年度中國(guó)商人
·   50位商界女強(qiáng)人
·   100家增長(zhǎng)最快的公司
·   40位40歲以下的商業(yè)精英
·   100家最適宜工作的公司
泰和县| 沁水县| 宜州市| 舒兰市| 赤城县| 万荣县| 颍上县| 毕节市| 德清县| 崇仁县| 汨罗市| 富蕴县| 金沙县| 米易县| 体育| 商南县| 娱乐| 荔波县| 万荣县| 新闻| 万全县| 天等县| 潍坊市| 绥芬河市| 铜鼓县| 蕲春县| 饶阳县| 高淳县| 惠来县| 方城县| 金华市| 徐汇区| 出国| 苏尼特左旗| 高密市| 安化县| 长白| 灵丘县| 扶余县| 墨竹工卡县| 司法|