国产一精品一AV一免费,亚洲成AV人片不卡无码,AV永久天堂一区二区三区,国产激情久久久久影院

訂閱

多平臺(tái)閱讀

微信訂閱

雜志

申請(qǐng)紙刊贈(zèng)閱

訂閱每日電郵

移動(dòng)應(yīng)用

專欄 - 從華爾街到硅谷

年度最佳私募股權(quán)基金盤點(diǎn)

Dan Primack 2011年11月17日

Dan Primack專注于報(bào)道交易和交易撮合者,從美國(guó)金融業(yè)到風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資業(yè)均有涉及。此前,Dan是湯森路透(Thomson Reuters)的自由編輯,推出了peHUB.com和peHUB Wire郵件服務(wù)。作為一名新聞工作者,Dan還曾在美國(guó)馬薩諸塞州羅克斯伯里經(jīng)營(yíng)一份社區(qū)報(bào)紙。目前他居住在波士頓附近。
給世界上最好的私募股權(quán)公司排排名吧。

????所有的私募股權(quán)公司都喜歡吹噓自己所管理基金的表現(xiàn),以至于像“前四分之一”這樣的評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)際上已經(jīng)失去了意義。但巴黎HEC商學(xué)院的管理策略教授奧利弗?戈沙爾格并不滿足于知道哪些公司是世界上表現(xiàn)最好的公司。他要給它們逐一排名。

????周一早間,戈沙爾格和道瓊斯公司(Dow Jones)發(fā)布了最新的一期私募股權(quán)公司表現(xiàn)排名報(bào)告(PE Performance Ranking Report)。報(bào)告分析了112家公司,這些公司在1998年至2007年間為726支基金總計(jì)籌集了約7,260億美元。下面是戈沙爾格對(duì)排名的解釋:

????總體表現(xiàn)分既不是內(nèi)部收益率式的年度回報(bào)率指標(biāo),也不是投資資金增值倍數(shù)。它只有參照我們所研究的所有私募股權(quán)公司的平均表現(xiàn)分來看才有意義:總體表現(xiàn)分為1,意味著這家私募股權(quán)公司比平均表現(xiàn)高一個(gè)“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差”,即它在所有樣本公司中處于前15%,即85% 的公司總體表現(xiàn)分低于它??傮w表現(xiàn)分為2,意味著這家公司的表現(xiàn)是總體表現(xiàn)分為1的公司的兩倍。表現(xiàn)屬于平均水平的私募股權(quán)公司的總體表現(xiàn)分(設(shè)定)為0。

????今年拔得頭籌的是1999年成立的荷蘭公司W(wǎng)aterland Private Equity,得分2.42。它的排名較去年的第三名(得分2.27)躍升了兩位。而過去連續(xù)兩年拔得頭籌的Leonard Green & Partners投資公司的排名則跌出了前20。

????緊隨Waterland之后,依次是Friedman Fleischer & Lowe(得分2.32)、鉑金資本(Platinum Equity,得分2.10)、海曼傅萊曼公司(Hellman & Friedman ,得分1.63)和德州太平洋投資集團(tuán)(TPG Capital,得分1.5)。

????Every private equity firm likes to brag about its fund performance, to the point that terms like "top quartile" have virtually lost their meanings. But Oliver Gottschalg, a professor of management strategy at HEC in Paris, isn't satisfied by knowing which group of firms are the world's best-performers. He wants to rank them, one-by-one.

????Gottschalg and Dow Jones this morning released their latest edition of the PE Performance Ranking Report, which analyzes 112 firms that raised around $726 billion for 726 funds between 1998 and 2007. Here is how Gottschalg explains his rankings:

????The aggregate performance score is neither an IRR-type annual return measure nor a money multiple. It can only be interpreted relative to the average aggregate performance score of all firms we analyzed: An aggregate performance score of 1 means that a given PE Firm has an aggregate performance that is one "standard deviation" above the average performance, which would position it typically at the 85th percentile, i.e. 85% of all firms would have a lower aggregate performance. Also, an aggregate performance score of 2 means that performance is twice as high as for an aggregate performance score of 1. A PE Firm with the average performance has (by design) an aggregate performance score of 0.

????This year's top firm was Waterland Private Equity, a Dutch group founded in 1999, which received a score of 2.42. This was a jump from third place in last year's ranking (when it received a 2.27). Leonard Green & Partners, which has led this ranking for the past two years, fell completely out of the top 20.

????Following Waterland were Friedman Fleischer & Lowe (2.32), Platinum Equity (2.10), Hellman & Friedman (1.63) and TPG Capital (1.5).

我來點(diǎn)評(píng)

  最新文章

最新文章:

中國(guó)煤業(yè)大遷徙

500強(qiáng)情報(bào)中心

財(cái)富專欄

林甸县| 五华县| 静安区| 甘洛县| 临洮县| 佳木斯市| 扶风县| 阳江市| 佛坪县| 新闻| 泰宁县| 仁寿县| 平凉市| 宣武区| 韩城市| 长沙县| 合山市| 齐齐哈尔市| 亚东县| 澄城县| 峨眉山市| 浮山县| 蕲春县| 长丰县| 合川市| 文化| 泸定县| 涿鹿县| 定远县| 松滋市| 定安县| 安吉县| 中牟县| 高尔夫| 巫山县| 大冶市| 东平县| 来安县| 如东县| 昭苏县| 屯昌县|