
? 達美航空(Delta)制定了長期戰(zhàn)略,通過摒棄固定票價模式、轉(zhuǎn)向基于人工智能的個性化定價來提升盈利能力。該公司表示,當(dāng)下人工智能定價機制已應(yīng)用于3%的機票,試點項目截至目前成效“顯著向好”。隱私維權(quán)人士擔(dān)憂此舉會引發(fā)價格欺詐,一位消費者權(quán)益代言人將此策略比作“黑客入侵我們的大腦”。
在公布超預(yù)期的財報后,達美航空正進一步借助人工智能技術(shù)來提高利潤率,其途徑是充分挖掘每位乘客的票價支付潛力以實現(xiàn)效益最大化。
達美航空總裁格倫·豪森斯坦(Glen Hauenstein)上周向投資者透露,到今年年底,該公司計劃將人工智能個性化定價的機票占比提升至20%。目前,該公司約3%的航班票價由人工智能決定,這一比例是九個月前的三倍。
在11月舉辦的公司投資者日活動上,豪森斯坦解釋道,長期規(guī)劃是徹底摒棄靜態(tài)定價模式。
“這是對我們現(xiàn)有定價方式及未來定價體系的全面重構(gòu),”他表示,最終目標是“針對每位乘客,在特定航班、特定時間提供專屬價格”。
他將人工智能比作“超級分析師”:“它全天24小時、每周7天持續(xù)工作,試圖模擬……實時票價應(yīng)如何設(shè)定?”
盡管該計劃的推行將歷經(jīng)“數(shù)年”,但他表示,初步結(jié)果顯示“單位收入顯著提升”。
達美航空通過與以色列公司Fetcherr合作實現(xiàn)這一定價模式。這家公司成立已有六年之久,其客戶還包括巴西阿蘇爾航空(Azul)、西捷航空(WestJet)、維珍航空(Virgin Atlantic)和VivaAerobus。Fetcherr的目標并不局限于航空領(lǐng)域。其聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人羅比·尼桑(Robby Nissan)在2022年的一場旅游會議上表示,“一旦在航空業(yè)站穩(wěn)腳跟,我們將進軍酒店、租車、游輪等領(lǐng)域”。
“入侵大腦”
盡管達美航空在人工智能的應(yīng)用方面展現(xiàn)出超乎尋常的透明度,但其他航空公司極有可能紛紛效仿。目前,美聯(lián)航(United Airlines)已運用生成式人工智能向乘客發(fā)送航班取消通知,美國航空(American Airlines)則借助該技術(shù)預(yù)測哪些乘客可能錯過航班。
“過去十多年里,實現(xiàn)個性化定價一直是航空公司的目標,”最早留意到達美航空人工智能定價戰(zhàn)略的旅游業(yè)權(quán)威人士加里·萊夫(Gary Leff)向《財富》雜志透露,“達美航空是首家如此公開討論人工智能定價的航空公司,不僅在秋季投資者日上宣傳其潛在收益,還在近期的財報電話會議中給出具體使用數(shù)據(jù)?!?/p>
隱私維權(quán)人士對達美航空的這一舉措表示擔(dān)憂?!八麄冊噲D窺探人們的想法,摸清大家究竟愿意支付多少費用,”加州非營利組織Consumer Watchdog的賈斯汀·克洛茨科(Justin Kloczko)表示,他專門分析所謂的“監(jiān)控定價”?!斑@本質(zhì)上是在入侵我們的大腦。”
亞利桑那州民主黨參議員魯本·加列戈(Ruben Gallego)稱達美航空的做法是“掠奪性定價”,并表示“絕不會坐視他們?nèi)绱诵惺隆薄?/p>
達美航空的一位發(fā)言人告訴《財富》雜志,該航空公司“對歧視行為零容忍。我們的票價均已公開備案,定價僅依據(jù)行程相關(guān)要素,如提前購票時長和艙位等級,且我們設(shè)有嚴格的保障機制,以確保符合聯(lián)邦法律要求”。
但當(dāng)被追問這些保障機制的具體內(nèi)容、是人工還是自動執(zhí)行,以及目前由Fetcherr設(shè)定的3%票價是否已公開備案時,該發(fā)言人未立即回應(yīng)。
“公平”定價時代終結(jié)
誠然,航空公司長期以來針對同一航線向不同乘客收取不同票價,其依據(jù)包括購票渠道(直接購票、通過比價網(wǎng)站或旅行社)、提前購票時長等因素。早在十年前,旅行網(wǎng)站便會根據(jù)購票者使用的瀏覽器等細節(jié),對同一行程顯示不同票價。但人工智能的應(yīng)用極大地強化了這種價格歧視,并使航空公司陷入法律層面的灰色地帶。
“人工智能不僅能優(yōu)化商業(yè)運營,還能從根本上重塑商業(yè)規(guī)則,改寫消費者體驗。”《人工智能世代》(Generation AI)一書作者馬特·布里頓(Matt Britton)向《財富》雜志表示,“對消費者而言,這意味著‘公平’定價時代終結(jié)。你看到的票價是算法認為你能接受的價格,而非統(tǒng)一劃定的價格?!?/p>
雖然差異化定價行為本身并不觸犯法律紅線,但聯(lián)邦法律禁止基于性別或種族對不同人群收取不同費用,且使用某些標識符(如郵政編碼)已被證明會對受保護群體造成不平等影響。由于缺乏所有票價的公開記錄,要確定達美航空是否因乘客屬于受保護群體而收取截然不同的票價,將極為困難,甚至不可能。
更為復(fù)雜的是,盡管行業(yè)專家預(yù)計人工智能將為達美航空帶來更多收入,但對乘客的影響尚不明確。萊夫表示,短期內(nèi),當(dāng)達美航空需要填補航班座位空缺時,運用人工智能或許意味著會提前釋放出更多的折扣優(yōu)惠。就短期而言,消費者在搜索機票價格時,使用虛擬專用網(wǎng)絡(luò)(VPN)并清除瀏覽器緩存可能會受益,但從長遠來看,達美航空及其他航空公司可能要求乘客“在購票時登錄賬戶以獲取航空公司的會員權(quán)益——本質(zhì)上是要求乘客完全進入其生態(tài)系統(tǒng),方可享受相應(yīng)福利(例如接受個性化定價以獲得有額外腿部空間的座位)”,萊夫說道。有關(guān)個性化定價的早期研究顯示,結(jié)果對消費者而言不容樂觀。Consumer Watchdog發(fā)現(xiàn),最優(yōu)惠的價格常常提供給最富有的客戶群體,最不劃算的價格則提供給最貧困的人群,而這部分人群極有可能缺乏其他可供選擇的替代方案。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
? 達美航空(Delta)制定了長期戰(zhàn)略,通過摒棄固定票價模式、轉(zhuǎn)向基于人工智能的個性化定價來提升盈利能力。該公司表示,當(dāng)下人工智能定價機制已應(yīng)用于3%的機票,試點項目截至目前成效“顯著向好”。隱私維權(quán)人士擔(dān)憂此舉會引發(fā)價格欺詐,一位消費者權(quán)益代言人將此策略比作“黑客入侵我們的大腦”。
在公布超預(yù)期的財報后,達美航空正進一步借助人工智能技術(shù)來提高利潤率,其途徑是充分挖掘每位乘客的票價支付潛力以實現(xiàn)效益最大化。
達美航空總裁格倫·豪森斯坦(Glen Hauenstein)上周向投資者透露,到今年年底,該公司計劃將人工智能個性化定價的機票占比提升至20%。目前,該公司約3%的航班票價由人工智能決定,這一比例是九個月前的三倍。
在11月舉辦的公司投資者日活動上,豪森斯坦解釋道,長期規(guī)劃是徹底摒棄靜態(tài)定價模式。
“這是對我們現(xiàn)有定價方式及未來定價體系的全面重構(gòu),”他表示,最終目標是“針對每位乘客,在特定航班、特定時間提供專屬價格”。
他將人工智能比作“超級分析師”:“它全天24小時、每周7天持續(xù)工作,試圖模擬……實時票價應(yīng)如何設(shè)定?”
盡管該計劃的推行將歷經(jīng)“數(shù)年”,但他表示,初步結(jié)果顯示“單位收入顯著提升”。
達美航空通過與以色列公司Fetcherr合作實現(xiàn)這一定價模式。這家公司成立已有六年之久,其客戶還包括巴西阿蘇爾航空(Azul)、西捷航空(WestJet)、維珍航空(Virgin Atlantic)和VivaAerobus。Fetcherr的目標并不局限于航空領(lǐng)域。其聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人羅比·尼桑(Robby Nissan)在2022年的一場旅游會議上表示,“一旦在航空業(yè)站穩(wěn)腳跟,我們將進軍酒店、租車、游輪等領(lǐng)域”。
“入侵大腦”
盡管達美航空在人工智能的應(yīng)用方面展現(xiàn)出超乎尋常的透明度,但其他航空公司極有可能紛紛效仿。目前,美聯(lián)航(United Airlines)已運用生成式人工智能向乘客發(fā)送航班取消通知,美國航空(American Airlines)則借助該技術(shù)預(yù)測哪些乘客可能錯過航班。
“過去十多年里,實現(xiàn)個性化定價一直是航空公司的目標,”最早留意到達美航空人工智能定價戰(zhàn)略的旅游業(yè)權(quán)威人士加里·萊夫(Gary Leff)向《財富》雜志透露,“達美航空是首家如此公開討論人工智能定價的航空公司,不僅在秋季投資者日上宣傳其潛在收益,還在近期的財報電話會議中給出具體使用數(shù)據(jù)。”
隱私維權(quán)人士對達美航空的這一舉措表示擔(dān)憂。“他們試圖窺探人們的想法,摸清大家究竟愿意支付多少費用,”加州非營利組織Consumer Watchdog的賈斯汀·克洛茨科(Justin Kloczko)表示,他專門分析所謂的“監(jiān)控定價”?!斑@本質(zhì)上是在入侵我們的大腦?!?
亞利桑那州民主黨參議員魯本·加列戈(Ruben Gallego)稱達美航空的做法是“掠奪性定價”,并表示“絕不會坐視他們?nèi)绱诵惺隆薄?/p>
達美航空的一位發(fā)言人告訴《財富》雜志,該航空公司“對歧視行為零容忍。我們的票價均已公開備案,定價僅依據(jù)行程相關(guān)要素,如提前購票時長和艙位等級,且我們設(shè)有嚴格的保障機制,以確保符合聯(lián)邦法律要求”。
但當(dāng)被追問這些保障機制的具體內(nèi)容、是人工還是自動執(zhí)行,以及目前由Fetcherr設(shè)定的3%票價是否已公開備案時,該發(fā)言人未立即回應(yīng)。
“公平”定價時代終結(jié)
誠然,航空公司長期以來針對同一航線向不同乘客收取不同票價,其依據(jù)包括購票渠道(直接購票、通過比價網(wǎng)站或旅行社)、提前購票時長等因素。早在十年前,旅行網(wǎng)站便會根據(jù)購票者使用的瀏覽器等細節(jié),對同一行程顯示不同票價。但人工智能的應(yīng)用極大地強化了這種價格歧視,并使航空公司陷入法律層面的灰色地帶。
“人工智能不僅能優(yōu)化商業(yè)運營,還能從根本上重塑商業(yè)規(guī)則,改寫消費者體驗?!薄度斯ぶ悄苁来罚℅eneration AI)一書作者馬特·布里頓(Matt Britton)向《財富》雜志表示,“對消費者而言,這意味著‘公平’定價時代終結(jié)。你看到的票價是算法認為你能接受的價格,而非統(tǒng)一劃定的價格。”
雖然差異化定價行為本身并不觸犯法律紅線,但聯(lián)邦法律禁止基于性別或種族對不同人群收取不同費用,且使用某些標識符(如郵政編碼)已被證明會對受保護群體造成不平等影響。由于缺乏所有票價的公開記錄,要確定達美航空是否因乘客屬于受保護群體而收取截然不同的票價,將極為困難,甚至不可能。
更為復(fù)雜的是,盡管行業(yè)專家預(yù)計人工智能將為達美航空帶來更多收入,但對乘客的影響尚不明確。萊夫表示,短期內(nèi),當(dāng)達美航空需要填補航班座位空缺時,運用人工智能或許意味著會提前釋放出更多的折扣優(yōu)惠。就短期而言,消費者在搜索機票價格時,使用虛擬專用網(wǎng)絡(luò)(VPN)并清除瀏覽器緩存可能會受益,但從長遠來看,達美航空及其他航空公司可能要求乘客“在購票時登錄賬戶以獲取航空公司的會員權(quán)益——本質(zhì)上是要求乘客完全進入其生態(tài)系統(tǒng),方可享受相應(yīng)福利(例如接受個性化定價以獲得有額外腿部空間的座位)”,萊夫說道。有關(guān)個性化定價的早期研究顯示,結(jié)果對消費者而言不容樂觀。Consumer Watchdog發(fā)現(xiàn),最優(yōu)惠的價格常常提供給最富有的客戶群體,最不劃算的價格則提供給最貧困的人群,而這部分人群極有可能缺乏其他可供選擇的替代方案。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
? Delta has a long-term strategy to boost its profitability by moving away from set fares and toward individualized pricing using AI. The pilot program, which uses AI for 3% of fares, has so far been “amazingly favorable,” the airline said. Privacy advocates fear this will lead to price-gouging, with one consumer advocate comparing the tactic to “hacking our brains.”
Fresh off a victory lap after a better-than-expected earnings report, Delta Air Lines is leaning into AI as a way to boost its profit margins further by maximizing what individual passengers pay for fares.
By the end of the year, Delta plans for 20% of its ticket prices to be individually determined using AI, president Glen Hauenstein told investors last week. Currently, about 3% of the airline’s flight prices are AI-determined, triple the portion from nine months ago.
Over time, the goal is to do away with static pricing altogether, Hauenstein explained during the company’s Investor Day in November.
“This is a full reengineering of how we price and how we will be pricing in the future,” he said. Eventually, “we will have a price that’s available on that flight, on that time, to you, the individual.”
He compared AI to “a super analyst” who is “working 24 hours a day, seven days a week and trying to simulate… real time, what should the price points be?”
While the rollout would be a “multiyear” process, he said, initial results “show amazingly favorable unit revenues.”
Delta accomplishes this pricing through a partnership with Fetcherr, a six-year-old Israeli company that also counts Azul, WestJet, Virgin Atlantic, and VivaAerobus as clients. And it has its sights set beyond flying. “Once we will be established in the airline industry, we will move to hospitality, car rentals, cruises, whatever,” cofounder Robby Nissan said at a travel conference in 2022.
‘Hacking our brains’
While Delta is unusually open about its use of AI, other carriers are likely to follow. Already, United Airlines uses generative AI to contact passengers about cancellations, while American Airlines uses it to predict who will miss their flight.
“Personalized pricing has been an airline goal for the past decade and a half,” Gary Leff, a travel industry authority who first noted Delta’s AI strategy, told Fortune. “Delta is the first major airline to speak so publicly about its use of AI pricing, to tout it for its potential upside at its investor day in the fall and to offer concrete metrics around its use in its recent earnings call.”
Privacy advocates noted Delta’s development with concern.“They are trying to see into people’s heads to see how much they’re willing to pay,” said Justin Kloczko, who analyzes so-called surveillance pricing for Consumer Watchdog, a California nonprofit. “They are basically hacking our brains.”
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) called Delta’s practice “predatory pricing,” saying, “I won’t let them get away with this.”
A Delta spokesperson told Fortune the airline “has zero tolerance for discrimination. Our fares are publicly filed and based solely on trip-related factors like advance purchase and cabin class, and we maintain strict safeguards to ensure compliance with federal law.”
The spokesperson did not immediately answer follow-up questions on what those safeguards were, whether they are human or automated, or where the 3% of fares that are currently set via Fetcherr are publicly filed.
‘Fair’ pricing is over
To be sure, airlines have long offered different prices to different people, even for the same route, based on factors like how travelers book—directly, via a comparison-shopping site or a travel agent—or how far in advance they shop. As far back as a decade ago, travel websites showed different prices for precisely the same itinerary based on details like which browser a purchaser was using to search for fares. But the use of AI supercharges this type of price discrimination and puts airlines into a legal gray area.
“AI isn’t just optimizing business operations, but fundamentally rewriting the rules of commerce and consumer experience,” Matt Britton, author of Generation AI, told Fortune. “For consumers, this means the era of “fair” pricing is over. The price you see is the price the algorithm thinks you’ll accept, not a universal rate.”
While differential pricing is not illegal per se, federal laws prohibit charging different rates to people based on their sex or ethnicity, and the use of some identifiers like ZIP codes have been shown to have a disparate impact on protected classes. Without a public record of all fares, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to determine if Delta is charging vastly different fares to people based on their membership in a protected class.
To complicate matters, while industry experts expect the impact of AI to mean more revenue for Delta, the impact for individual passengers is less certain. In the short-term, AI might mean more discounts offered upfront when Delta needs to fill seats, said Leff. Short-term, shoppers might benefit from using a VPN and clearing cookies when browsing for airfares, but long-term, Delta and other airlines might require passengers “to be logged in for purchase of tickets in order to obtain status benefits from an airline, essentially being fully within their ecosystem to gain the benefits of that system (i.e. submit to personalized pricing to get extra legroom seats),” Leff said. Early research on personalized pricing isn’t favorable for the consumer. Consumer Watchdog found that the best deals were offered to the wealthiest customers—with the worst deals given to the poorest people, who are least likely to have other options.