
隨著中國在制造業(yè)能力上持續(xù)超越美國,關(guān)稅可能并非美國提振工廠生產(chǎn)力的最佳策略。高盛分析師指出,美國制造業(yè)應(yīng)借助人工智能和自動(dòng)化技術(shù)來獲取優(yōu)勢(shì)。
特朗普總統(tǒng)一直希望通過對(duì)美國制造業(yè)競爭對(duì)手征收高額關(guān)稅,促使工廠崗位回流美國本土。然而,分析師在上周四發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告中稱,這些關(guān)稅對(duì)制造業(yè)回流的激勵(lì)作用十分有限。相反,制造商應(yīng)將自動(dòng)化和日益普及的人工智能視為提升本土制造業(yè)的最佳契機(jī)。
分析師約瑟夫?布里格斯及其同事在報(bào)告中指出:“或許受近期機(jī)器人技術(shù)和生成式人工智能進(jìn)步的推動(dòng),創(chuàng)新步伐有所加快,對(duì)于扭轉(zhuǎn)制造業(yè)長期停滯的生產(chǎn)力來說,這仍是最有希望的催化劑?!?/p>
隨著中國利用自動(dòng)化和低廉的勞動(dòng)力擴(kuò)大出口規(guī)模,美國銀行研究所(Bank of America Institute)發(fā)現(xiàn),越來越多的證據(jù)表明美國制造業(yè)近期有所放緩。其中,來自美國人口普查局(U.S. Census Bureau)的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,4月份制成耐用品的新訂單減少了6.3%。美國供應(yīng)管理協(xié)會(huì)制造業(yè)采購經(jīng)理人指數(shù)(PMI)自3月以來亦出現(xiàn)下滑,進(jìn)一步表明制造業(yè)在收縮。
高盛指出,美國的生產(chǎn)力問題是過去二十年來整體制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力放緩的一個(gè)縮影。造成這一現(xiàn)象的原因包括全球金融危機(jī)后投資的回落,以及21世紀(jì)初出現(xiàn)的科技進(jìn)步爆發(fā)式增長的放緩。
特朗普針對(duì)中國的關(guān)稅計(jì)劃旨在幫助美國從其經(jīng)濟(jì)競爭對(duì)手手中奪回制造業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)。盡管特朗普總統(tǒng)曾吹噓達(dá)成了一項(xiàng)新的貿(mào)易協(xié)議,但并未披露其細(xì)節(jié)。然而,高盛在報(bào)告中指出,關(guān)稅會(huì)增加消費(fèi)者的生活成本,也并非制造商的萬能解決方案。
報(bào)告稱:“關(guān)稅不太可能導(dǎo)致大規(guī)模的制造業(yè)回流,因?yàn)閷?duì)于大多數(shù)產(chǎn)品而言,其他國家的生產(chǎn)成本仍遠(yuǎn)低于美國(即使考慮關(guān)稅因素)。此外,在中國成本優(yōu)勢(shì)和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的支持下,其出口可能會(huì)繼續(xù)增長?!?/p>
工廠自動(dòng)化的崛起
相反,分析師布里格斯表示,美國應(yīng)關(guān)注其處于落后地位的另一個(gè)領(lǐng)域:自動(dòng)化。
波士頓咨詢公司亨德森研究所(BCG Henderson Institute)上月早些時(shí)候發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告顯示,美國的工廠運(yùn)營人工智能使用率落后于其他制造業(yè)強(qiáng)國。在BCG涉及1000家制造商的全球制造業(yè)調(diào)查中,僅有46%的美國受訪者表示其工廠中有多個(gè)人工智能用例,這一比例低于62%的全球平均水平,也落后于中國的77%。
布里格斯在接受《財(cái)富》采訪時(shí)表示:“我認(rèn)為,人工智能夠帶來成本競爭力,是推動(dòng)生產(chǎn)力增長的關(guān)鍵技術(shù)之一,但它在美國制造業(yè)領(lǐng)域并沒有得到大范圍的采用。”
布里格斯解釋說,由于全球金融危機(jī)的 “后遺癥”,美國此前并未在工廠自動(dòng)化方面進(jìn)行投資。不過,鑒于自動(dòng)化和人工智能技術(shù)的日益普及且價(jià)格逐漸親民,美國如今正面臨絕佳的機(jī)會(huì),應(yīng)優(yōu)先開展工廠技術(shù)升級(jí)。
像航空精密零件制造商MSP Manufacturing這樣的公司已經(jīng)開始做出調(diào)整。MSP總裁兼首席運(yùn)營官約翰尼?古德最近發(fā)現(xiàn)了一款由人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)的軟件,該軟件可以為制造精密零件的機(jī)器編程,將每個(gè)零件的生產(chǎn)時(shí)間從一個(gè)半小時(shí)縮短到僅7分鐘,外加15分鐘的操作員打磨時(shí)長。
古德上周在接受《財(cái)富》雜志記者杰里米?卡恩采訪時(shí)表示:“我對(duì)此感到十分震驚,這將是一項(xiàng)顛覆性的技術(shù)。從90分鐘縮短到22分鐘是一個(gè)巨大的進(jìn)步,而且我們發(fā)現(xiàn),隨著軟件使用熟練度的提升,耗時(shí)甚至?xí)??!?/p>
終結(jié)制造業(yè)的放緩
高盛分析師承認(rèn),盡管自動(dòng)化或?qū)⒆畲蟪潭鹊赝苿?dòng)美國制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力的增長,但它不大可能獨(dú)自解決更廣泛的全球制造業(yè)放緩問題。布里格斯稱這種放緩屬于“歷史罕見”,其主要原因可能源于科技行業(yè)的成熟。全球生產(chǎn)力回升的所有希望都將取決于人工智能和機(jī)器人技術(shù)的大規(guī)模進(jìn)步與應(yīng)用。
布里格斯表示:“創(chuàng)新步伐的大幅提升才是推動(dòng)制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力和增速顯著提升的關(guān)鍵因素。然而,我們很難預(yù)測科技進(jìn)步的拐點(diǎn)何時(shí)會(huì)出現(xiàn)?!?/p>
科技進(jìn)步會(huì)為本土制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力帶來雙重好處:提升工廠的投資力度,以及改進(jìn)工廠中現(xiàn)有技術(shù),以實(shí)現(xiàn)作業(yè)自動(dòng)化。然而,由于未來人工智能和自動(dòng)化應(yīng)用的具體情況仍不是很明朗,因此我們難以預(yù)測美國是否真的能夠逆轉(zhuǎn)其制造業(yè)放緩趨勢(shì)。
布里格斯說:“只有看到實(shí)實(shí)在在的進(jìn)展之后,我們才能堅(jiān)定地認(rèn)為這種模式將成為一種首要驅(qū)動(dòng)力?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
隨著中國在制造業(yè)能力上持續(xù)超越美國,關(guān)稅可能并非美國提振工廠生產(chǎn)力的最佳策略。高盛分析師指出,美國制造業(yè)應(yīng)借助人工智能和自動(dòng)化技術(shù)來獲取優(yōu)勢(shì)。
特朗普總統(tǒng)一直希望通過對(duì)美國制造業(yè)競爭對(duì)手征收高額關(guān)稅,促使工廠崗位回流美國本土。然而,分析師在上周四發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告中稱,這些關(guān)稅對(duì)制造業(yè)回流的激勵(lì)作用十分有限。相反,制造商應(yīng)將自動(dòng)化和日益普及的人工智能視為提升本土制造業(yè)的最佳契機(jī)。
分析師約瑟夫?布里格斯及其同事在報(bào)告中指出:“或許受近期機(jī)器人技術(shù)和生成式人工智能進(jìn)步的推動(dòng),創(chuàng)新步伐有所加快,對(duì)于扭轉(zhuǎn)制造業(yè)長期停滯的生產(chǎn)力來說,這仍是最有希望的催化劑?!?/p>
隨著中國利用自動(dòng)化和低廉的勞動(dòng)力擴(kuò)大出口規(guī)模,美國銀行研究所(Bank of America Institute)發(fā)現(xiàn),越來越多的證據(jù)表明美國制造業(yè)近期有所放緩。其中,來自美國人口普查局(U.S. Census Bureau)的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,4月份制成耐用品的新訂單減少了6.3%。美國供應(yīng)管理協(xié)會(huì)制造業(yè)采購經(jīng)理人指數(shù)(PMI)自3月以來亦出現(xiàn)下滑,進(jìn)一步表明制造業(yè)在收縮。
高盛指出,美國的生產(chǎn)力問題是過去二十年來整體制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力放緩的一個(gè)縮影。造成這一現(xiàn)象的原因包括全球金融危機(jī)后投資的回落,以及21世紀(jì)初出現(xiàn)的科技進(jìn)步爆發(fā)式增長的放緩。
特朗普針對(duì)中國的關(guān)稅計(jì)劃旨在幫助美國從其經(jīng)濟(jì)競爭對(duì)手手中奪回制造業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)。盡管特朗普總統(tǒng)曾吹噓達(dá)成了一項(xiàng)新的貿(mào)易協(xié)議,但并未披露其細(xì)節(jié)。然而,高盛在報(bào)告中指出,關(guān)稅會(huì)增加消費(fèi)者的生活成本,也并非制造商的萬能解決方案。
報(bào)告稱:“關(guān)稅不太可能導(dǎo)致大規(guī)模的制造業(yè)回流,因?yàn)閷?duì)于大多數(shù)產(chǎn)品而言,其他國家的生產(chǎn)成本仍遠(yuǎn)低于美國(即使考慮關(guān)稅因素)。此外,在中國成本優(yōu)勢(shì)和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的支持下,其出口可能會(huì)繼續(xù)增長。”
工廠自動(dòng)化的崛起
相反,分析師布里格斯表示,美國應(yīng)關(guān)注其處于落后地位的另一個(gè)領(lǐng)域:自動(dòng)化。
波士頓咨詢公司亨德森研究所(BCG Henderson Institute)上月早些時(shí)候發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告顯示,美國的工廠運(yùn)營人工智能使用率落后于其他制造業(yè)強(qiáng)國。在BCG涉及1000家制造商的全球制造業(yè)調(diào)查中,僅有46%的美國受訪者表示其工廠中有多個(gè)人工智能用例,這一比例低于62%的全球平均水平,也落后于中國的77%。
布里格斯在接受《財(cái)富》采訪時(shí)表示:“我認(rèn)為,人工智能夠帶來成本競爭力,是推動(dòng)生產(chǎn)力增長的關(guān)鍵技術(shù)之一,但它在美國制造業(yè)領(lǐng)域并沒有得到大范圍的采用。”
布里格斯解釋說,由于全球金融危機(jī)的 “后遺癥”,美國此前并未在工廠自動(dòng)化方面進(jìn)行投資。不過,鑒于自動(dòng)化和人工智能技術(shù)的日益普及且價(jià)格逐漸親民,美國如今正面臨絕佳的機(jī)會(huì),應(yīng)優(yōu)先開展工廠技術(shù)升級(jí)。
像航空精密零件制造商MSP Manufacturing這樣的公司已經(jīng)開始做出調(diào)整。MSP總裁兼首席運(yùn)營官約翰尼?古德最近發(fā)現(xiàn)了一款由人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)的軟件,該軟件可以為制造精密零件的機(jī)器編程,將每個(gè)零件的生產(chǎn)時(shí)間從一個(gè)半小時(shí)縮短到僅7分鐘,外加15分鐘的操作員打磨時(shí)長。
古德上周在接受《財(cái)富》雜志記者杰里米?卡恩采訪時(shí)表示:“我對(duì)此感到十分震驚,這將是一項(xiàng)顛覆性的技術(shù)。從90分鐘縮短到22分鐘是一個(gè)巨大的進(jìn)步,而且我們發(fā)現(xiàn),隨著軟件使用熟練度的提升,耗時(shí)甚至?xí)?。?/p>
終結(jié)制造業(yè)的放緩
高盛分析師承認(rèn),盡管自動(dòng)化或?qū)⒆畲蟪潭鹊赝苿?dòng)美國制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力的增長,但它不大可能獨(dú)自解決更廣泛的全球制造業(yè)放緩問題。布里格斯稱這種放緩屬于“歷史罕見”,其主要原因可能源于科技行業(yè)的成熟。全球生產(chǎn)力回升的所有希望都將取決于人工智能和機(jī)器人技術(shù)的大規(guī)模進(jìn)步與應(yīng)用。
布里格斯表示:“創(chuàng)新步伐的大幅提升才是推動(dòng)制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力和增速顯著提升的關(guān)鍵因素。然而,我們很難預(yù)測科技進(jìn)步的拐點(diǎn)何時(shí)會(huì)出現(xiàn)?!?/p>
科技進(jìn)步會(huì)為本土制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)力帶來雙重好處:提升工廠的投資力度,以及改進(jìn)工廠中現(xiàn)有技術(shù),以實(shí)現(xiàn)作業(yè)自動(dòng)化。然而,由于未來人工智能和自動(dòng)化應(yīng)用的具體情況仍不是很明朗,因此我們難以預(yù)測美國是否真的能夠逆轉(zhuǎn)其制造業(yè)放緩趨勢(shì)。
布里格斯說:“只有看到實(shí)實(shí)在在的進(jìn)展之后,我們才能堅(jiān)定地認(rèn)為這種模式將成為一種首要驅(qū)動(dòng)力?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
As China continues to outperform the United States in manufacturing capabilities, tariffs may not be the best strategy for America to boost factory productivity. Goldman Sachs analysts suggest that the U.S. should instead look to artificial intelligence (AI) and automation to gain an edge in manufacturing.
President Donald Trump has aimed to bring factory jobs back to American shores by imposing steep tariffs on U.S. manufacturing rivals. However, analysts stated in a note published on Thursday that such tariffs can only incentivize reshoring to a limited extent. Instead, manufacturers should regard automation and the increasingly accessible artificial intelligence as their best opportunity to boost domestic manufacturing.
"A pickup in the pace of innovation—potentially driven by recent advances in robotics and generative AI—thus remains the most likely catalyst to reverse the long-term stagnation in manufacturing productivity," analyst Joseph Briggs and his colleagues wrote in the note.
As China leverages automation and cheaper labor to expand its export footprint, the Bank of America Institute has found growing evidence of a recent slowdown in U.S. manufacturing. This includes data from the U.S. Census Bureau showing that new orders for manufactured durable goods decreased by 6.3% in April. The Institute of Supply Management Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) has also declined since March, further indicating a contraction.
According to Goldman Sachs, the U.S.’s productivity challenges are part of a broader manufacturing productivity slowdown that has been ongoing for the past two decades. This slowdown is attributed to a pullback in investment following the global financial crisis, as well as a deceleration in the technological advancements that burst forth in the early 2000s.
Trump’s tariff plans for China—though the president has touted a new trade deal, he has not disclosed the specifics—aim to help the U.S. reclaim manufacturing opportunities from its economic rival. However, the bank argued in its note that while tariffs make consumers’ lives more expensive, they are not a cure-all for manufacturers.
"Tariffs are unlikely to lead to significant reshoring because, for most products, production costs in other countries remain well below those in the U.S. (even after accounting for tariffs). Moreover, China is likely to continue growing its exports, supported by cost advantages and industrial policy," the note stated.
The Rise of Factory Automation
Instead, analyst Briggs said the U.S. should focus on another area where it is lagging: automation.
A report released earlier this month by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Henderson Institute shows that the U.S. has trailed other manufacturing powerhouses in implementing AI in factory operations. In BCG’s Global Manufacturing Survey of 1,000 manufacturers, only 46% of U.S. respondents reported multiple use cases of AI in their plants. This falls short of the global average of 62% and lags behind China’s 77%.
"This is one of the key technologies that I think could drive productivity growth in a cost-competitive way," Briggs told Fortune. "And we just haven’t seen this happen on a significant scale yet."
Briggs explained that the U.S. did not previously invest in factory automation due to a "hangover" from the global financial crisis. However, given the growing prevalence and thus affordability of automation and AI, the U.S. now has a real opportunity to prioritize factory technology upgrades.
Companies like MSP Manufacturing, which specializes in aviation precision parts, have already started to adapt. Johnny Goode, president and COO of MSP, recently discovered an AI-powered software that can program the machines used to build precision parts. This has reduced production time from an hour and a half to just seven minutes per part, plus an additional 15 minutes for human operators to refine the parts.
"I was amazed, thinking this is going to be a game-changer," Goode told Fortune’s Jeremy Kahn this week. "Going from 90 minutes to 22 minutes is a huge improvement, and we’ve seen even better results as we’ve become more proficient in using the software."
Ending the Manufacturing Slowdown
Goldman Sachs analysts acknowledged that while automation offers the greatest potential for growth in U.S. manufacturing productivity, it is unlikely to single-handedly solve the broader global manufacturing slowdown. Briggs described the slowdown as "historically unusual," with the maturation of the tech sector likely being the main cause. Any hope for a global uptick in productivity would depend on the mass advancement and adoption of AI and robotics on a large scale.
"The key factor that would drive a significant increase in manufacturing productivity and growth is a sharp acceleration in the pace of innovation," Briggs said. "However, this kind of inflection point in technological progress is very difficult to predict."
Technological advancements could bring a twofold benefit to domestic manufacturing productivity: driving factory investments and improving the technology installed in factories to automate tasks. However, with the specifics of future AI and automation applications still unclear, it is challenging to predict whether a reversal of the domestic manufacturing slowdown is truly feasible.
"We need to see tangible progress before we can have strong confidence that this dynamic will become a major driver," Briggs said.