
? OpenAI首席執(zhí)行官山姆·奧爾特曼指出,不同世代用戶(hù)使用ChatGPT的方式存在差異。年輕群體更傾向于將其視為生活顧問(wèn),而年長(zhǎng)用戶(hù)則多將其作為谷歌(Google)等搜索引擎的替代者。對(duì)于使用大語(yǔ)言模型獲取生活建議是否安全,專(zhuān)家意見(jiàn)存在分歧。
隨著ChatGPT的功能日益強(qiáng)大,其實(shí)際應(yīng)用場(chǎng)景不斷拓展。OpenAI首席執(zhí)行官山姆·奧爾特曼指出,事實(shí)證明,不同世代用戶(hù)使用這款產(chǎn)品的方式存在差異。
奧爾特曼在本月初紅杉資本(Sequoia Capital)舉辦的“AI Ascent”峰會(huì)上表示:"雖然這樣說(shuō)有些過(guò)度簡(jiǎn)單化,但大體上年長(zhǎng)用戶(hù)將ChatGPT視作谷歌的替代品。二三十歲的年輕人將其作為生活顧問(wèn),而大學(xué)生則將其作為操作系統(tǒng)深度使用?!?/p>
風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資公司紅杉資本在2021年最先投資OpenAI,當(dāng)時(shí)其估值為140億美元。如今,經(jīng)過(guò)史上最大規(guī)模的私募融資后,OpenAI的估值已高達(dá)3,000億美元。紅杉資本的投資版圖還包括英偉達(dá)(Nvidia)、Reddit、Instacart、YouTube、蘋(píng)果(Apple)、Dropbox、Airbnb和Doordash等科技巨頭。
奧爾特曼指出,年輕用戶(hù)如同操控操作系統(tǒng)一樣使用ChatGPT。他們會(huì)進(jìn)行復(fù)雜設(shè)置,將其關(guān)聯(lián)到文件系統(tǒng),并且會(huì)記憶或存儲(chǔ)復(fù)雜的提示詞。
奧爾特曼說(shuō)道:“我認(rèn)為,這種用法很酷炫,而且令人印象深刻。更有趣的是,他們?cè)诒仨氉龀鋈松鷽Q定之前,會(huì)先詢(xún)問(wèn)ChatGPT的意見(jiàn)。”
今年早些時(shí)候,OpenAI發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告稱(chēng),與所有其他使用場(chǎng)景和用戶(hù)群體相比,美國(guó)大學(xué)年齡段的年輕人最熱衷于使用ChatGPT,報(bào)告還指出美國(guó)超過(guò)三分之一18-24歲的年輕人正在使用ChatGPT。
年輕人之所以能夠積極利用ChatGPT,是因?yàn)檫@款A(yù)I產(chǎn)品會(huì)保留用戶(hù)之前的對(duì)話(huà)記錄。奧爾特曼表示:“它能完整掌握用戶(hù)生活各方面的信息及過(guò)往的交流內(nèi)容?!?/p>
有報(bào)告顯示,用戶(hù)已將ChatGPT應(yīng)用于從情感咨詢(xún)到商業(yè)決策、醫(yī)療問(wèn)診等廣泛領(lǐng)域,甚至有人將其作為心理談話(huà)治療的替代方案。
但相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的專(zhuān)家質(zhì)疑依賴(lài)AI進(jìn)行重大人生決策是否可取,并對(duì)其安全性提出質(zhì)疑。例如,2023年11月的一項(xiàng)研究“強(qiáng)調(diào)使用ChatGPT獲取安全相關(guān)信息時(shí)需謹(jǐn)慎,必須經(jīng)過(guò)專(zhuān)家驗(yàn)證,同時(shí)亟需建立倫理規(guī)范與保障措施,確保用戶(hù)理解技術(shù)局限并獲得恰當(dāng)建議?!绷硗庖豁?xiàng)研究表示,ChatGPT等大語(yǔ)言模型“存在先天的反社會(huì)人格特質(zhì)”,因此它所提供的建議可信度存疑。
但有其他研究和試驗(yàn)證明,使用ChatGPT獲取普通建議基本不會(huì)造成傷害,在某些情況下甚至能提供有效幫助。
針對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志關(guān)于"ChatGPT的建議是否安全可靠"的質(zhì)詢(xún),OpenAI尚未做出回應(yīng)。
奧爾特曼在紅杉資本的峰會(huì)上表示,20歲用戶(hù)與年長(zhǎng)用戶(hù)的使用方式“差異堪稱(chēng)天壤之別”。
他表示:“這讓我想起智能手機(jī)剛問(wèn)世時(shí)的場(chǎng)景——孩子們瞬間就能玩轉(zhuǎn)所有功能,而年長(zhǎng)者花了三年才學(xué)會(huì)基本操作。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
? OpenAI首席執(zhí)行官山姆·奧爾特曼指出,不同世代用戶(hù)使用ChatGPT的方式存在差異。年輕群體更傾向于將其視為生活顧問(wèn),而年長(zhǎng)用戶(hù)則多將其作為谷歌(Google)等搜索引擎的替代者。對(duì)于使用大語(yǔ)言模型獲取生活建議是否安全,專(zhuān)家意見(jiàn)存在分歧。
隨著ChatGPT的功能日益強(qiáng)大,其實(shí)際應(yīng)用場(chǎng)景不斷拓展。OpenAI首席執(zhí)行官山姆·奧爾特曼指出,事實(shí)證明,不同世代用戶(hù)使用這款產(chǎn)品的方式存在差異。
奧爾特曼在本月初紅杉資本(Sequoia Capital)舉辦的“AI Ascent”峰會(huì)上表示:"雖然這樣說(shuō)有些過(guò)度簡(jiǎn)單化,但大體上年長(zhǎng)用戶(hù)將ChatGPT視作谷歌的替代品。二三十歲的年輕人將其作為生活顧問(wèn),而大學(xué)生則將其作為操作系統(tǒng)深度使用?!?/p>
風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資公司紅杉資本在2021年最先投資OpenAI,當(dāng)時(shí)其估值為140億美元。如今,經(jīng)過(guò)史上最大規(guī)模的私募融資后,OpenAI的估值已高達(dá)3,000億美元。紅杉資本的投資版圖還包括英偉達(dá)(Nvidia)、Reddit、Instacart、YouTube、蘋(píng)果(Apple)、Dropbox、Airbnb和Doordash等科技巨頭。
奧爾特曼指出,年輕用戶(hù)如同操控操作系統(tǒng)一樣使用ChatGPT。他們會(huì)進(jìn)行復(fù)雜設(shè)置,將其關(guān)聯(lián)到文件系統(tǒng),并且會(huì)記憶或存儲(chǔ)復(fù)雜的提示詞。
奧爾特曼說(shuō)道:“我認(rèn)為,這種用法很酷炫,而且令人印象深刻。更有趣的是,他們?cè)诒仨氉龀鋈松鷽Q定之前,會(huì)先詢(xún)問(wèn)ChatGPT的意見(jiàn)?!?/p>
今年早些時(shí)候,OpenAI發(fā)布的一份報(bào)告稱(chēng),與所有其他使用場(chǎng)景和用戶(hù)群體相比,美國(guó)大學(xué)年齡段的年輕人最熱衷于使用ChatGPT,報(bào)告還指出美國(guó)超過(guò)三分之一18-24歲的年輕人正在使用ChatGPT。
年輕人之所以能夠積極利用ChatGPT,是因?yàn)檫@款A(yù)I產(chǎn)品會(huì)保留用戶(hù)之前的對(duì)話(huà)記錄。奧爾特曼表示:“它能完整掌握用戶(hù)生活各方面的信息及過(guò)往的交流內(nèi)容?!?/p>
有報(bào)告顯示,用戶(hù)已將ChatGPT應(yīng)用于從情感咨詢(xún)到商業(yè)決策、醫(yī)療問(wèn)診等廣泛領(lǐng)域,甚至有人將其作為心理談話(huà)治療的替代方案。
但相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的專(zhuān)家質(zhì)疑依賴(lài)AI進(jìn)行重大人生決策是否可取,并對(duì)其安全性提出質(zhì)疑。例如,2023年11月的一項(xiàng)研究“強(qiáng)調(diào)使用ChatGPT獲取安全相關(guān)信息時(shí)需謹(jǐn)慎,必須經(jīng)過(guò)專(zhuān)家驗(yàn)證,同時(shí)亟需建立倫理規(guī)范與保障措施,確保用戶(hù)理解技術(shù)局限并獲得恰當(dāng)建議?!绷硗庖豁?xiàng)研究表示,ChatGPT等大語(yǔ)言模型“存在先天的反社會(huì)人格特質(zhì)”,因此它所提供的建議可信度存疑。
但有其他研究和試驗(yàn)證明,使用ChatGPT獲取普通建議基本不會(huì)造成傷害,在某些情況下甚至能提供有效幫助。
針對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志關(guān)于"ChatGPT的建議是否安全可靠"的質(zhì)詢(xún),OpenAI尚未做出回應(yīng)。
奧爾特曼在紅杉資本的峰會(huì)上表示,20歲用戶(hù)與年長(zhǎng)用戶(hù)的使用方式“差異堪稱(chēng)天壤之別”。
他表示:“這讓我想起智能手機(jī)剛問(wèn)世時(shí)的場(chǎng)景——孩子們瞬間就能玩轉(zhuǎn)所有功能,而年長(zhǎng)者花了三年才學(xué)會(huì)基本操作?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said different generations use ChatGPT in different ways. Younger people tend to use it more as an adviser, while older generations use it as a replacement for a search tool, like Google. Experts are divided on whether it’s safe to use LLMs for advice.
As ChatGPT becomes more sophisticated, its practical use cases grow. And as it turns out, different generations use the product differently, according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
“Gross oversimplification, but like older people use ChatGPT as a Google replacement. Maybe people in their 20s and 30s use it as like a life adviser, and then, like people in college use it as an operating system,” Altman said at Sequoia Capital’s AI Ascent event earlier this month.
Venture-capital firm Sequoia first invested in OpenAI in 2021 when the company was valued at $14 billion. Currently, OpenAI is valued at $300 billion after one of the largest-ever private funding rounds. Sequoia has also invested in other tech giants like Nvidia, Reddit, Instacart, YouTube, Apple, Dropbox, Airbnb, and Doordash.
Altman said young people use ChatGPT similar to how they’d use an operating system. They have complex ways to set it up and connect it to files and have fairly complex prompts memorized or saved somewhere.
“I mean, that stuff, I think, is all cool and impressive,” Altman said. “And there’s this other thing where, like, they don’t really make life decisions without asking ChatGPT what they should do.”
Earlier this year, OpenAI published a report saying “more than any other use case, more than any other kind of user, college-aged young adults in the U.S. are embracing ChatGPT, adding that more than one-third of 18-to-24 year olds use ChatGPT.
Younger users are able to do this since ChatGPT has memory of previous conversations the user has had with the AI product. “It has the full context on every person in their life and what they’ve talked about,” Altman said.
Reports show people have started using ChatGPT for anything ranging from relationship advice to business and medical questions. Others use it as a replacement for talk therapy.
Meanwhile, experts in those respective fields are torn on whether it’s safe and advisable to consult ChatGPT for major life decisions. For example, a November 2023 study “highlights the need for caution when using ChatGPT for safety-related information and expert verification, as well as the need for ethical considerations and safeguards to ensure users understand the limitations and receive appropriate advice.” Another study said large language models, like ChatGPT, are “inherently sociopathic,” making it difficult to trust their advice.
Other studies and experiments, however, show using ChatGPT for common advice to be harmless—and even helpful in some cases.
OpenAI didn’t immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment about whether it’s safe or reliable to use ChatGPT for advice.
“The difference is unbelievable” in how a 20-year-old might use ChatGPT versus older generations, Altman said during the Sequoia talk.
“It reminds me of, like, when the smartphone came out, and, like, every kid was able to use it super well,” Altman said. “And older people, just like, took, like, three years to figure out how to do basic stuff.”