国产一精品一AV一免费,亚洲成AV人片不卡无码,AV永久天堂一区二区三区,国产激情久久久久影院

首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 商潮 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

特斯拉股價猛增,但對股東有何意義?

SHAWN TULLY
2021-10-11

特斯拉的問題在于,即使它取得了輝煌的成功,它也永遠(yuǎn)為股東提供回報。

文本設(shè)置
小號
默認(rèn)
大號
Plus(0條)

在資本市場的史冊中,牛市從未使人們像對去年特斯拉股價的大幅上漲(相對其規(guī)模來說)一樣,對公司未來業(yè)績的期望如此之高。您是否相信,自2020年10月初以來,該電動汽車制造商的大膽創(chuàng)新計劃實際上要求其創(chuàng)造1,000億美元的額外利潤,克服其一年前所面臨的困難(那時其市值低得多),并在未來十年為投資者提供可觀的回報?長期以來,特斯拉的問題在于,即使它取得了輝煌的成功,它也永遠(yuǎn)無法以驚人的表現(xiàn)為股東冒著最大風(fēng)險下的賭注提供回報,因為它的估值太高了。即使經(jīng)歷了年中的大幅下跌之后,購買特斯拉股票仍不劃算,但新的股價猛漲起著決定性的作用。其實質(zhì)上保證了它的超級粉絲對這個偉大的公司定價過高,且定價過高的程度如此之大,以至于特斯拉股票成為一項糟糕的投資。

2020年10月7日——正好一年前——特斯拉股價收于425美元。由于其大約發(fā)行10億股股票,就像今天一樣,因此其市值達(dá)4,250億美元。我們假設(shè),投資者和基金希望每年獲得10%的回報,以彌補(bǔ)特斯拉股價的極端波動性,以及其太陽能和電池業(yè)務(wù)極有可能無法提供使其盈利能力超過任何汽車制造商所需的額外收益的情況。由于特斯拉不支付股息,且可能需要保留其所有收益,以實現(xiàn)高速增長,因此所有的收益將不得不源自股票價格的不斷上漲。從一年前來看,如果特斯拉的股價在接下來的10年里上漲160%,達(dá)到1,105美元,那么它的回報率就可能突破10%大關(guān)。我們再假設(shè),即使在一個快速增長期之后,投資者仍然會將特斯拉評價為“超速駕駛者”,并授予它30倍的溢價/市盈率。由此簡單計算可得,十年后,它需要每年賺370億美元。

簡單來說,我們假設(shè)特斯拉的起始利潤與上一季度按年率計算的利潤相同,大約為30億美元(減去出售即將到期的碳排放信用額度所得的收入,并調(diào)整稅率)。為了達(dá)到這個目標(biāo),特斯拉的利潤需要每年增長28%左右。在這種“成功”取得利潤的情況下,它在這10年的收益將達(dá)1,480億美元。每年,特斯拉需要創(chuàng)造比盈利頗豐的美國銀行(Bank of America)多三分之一的利潤,但是該利潤仍遠(yuǎn)低于微軟(Microsoft)或蘋果(Apple)創(chuàng)造的數(shù)額。

特斯拉最近的反彈大大提高了這個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。10月7日,該公司股價自2月份以來首次突破800美元,使其估值飆升至8,000億美元。現(xiàn)在特斯拉必須跑得更快才能取得同樣的兩位數(shù)回報率。其市值仍需從高得多的基數(shù)上調(diào)160%,2031年10月達(dá)到2.1萬億美元(股價為每股2,100美元)。以相同的30倍的溢價倍數(shù)計算,其利潤將達(dá)到700億美元。這比微軟當(dāng)下賺得的(620億美元)還要多,且相當(dāng)于蘋果過去四個季度利潤的80%(868億美元),這是一家非政府贊助的市場參與者有史以來的最高利潤總額。一路走來,特斯拉的利潤將從我們的30億美元基數(shù)每年增長37%。這比一年前其市值為4,250億美元時的28%的增長要求快了整整9個百分點。

特斯拉將需要創(chuàng)造總計2,480億美元的凈收入。這比去年的1,480億美元高出三分之二?,F(xiàn)在特斯拉必須比去年10月的盈利額多賺1億美元才能奪冠。即使特斯拉一舉奪魁,超越所有其他汽車制造商,對特斯拉的投資也不會得到回報,而且?guī)缀跛懈邇r股票都是如此。

事實上,更有可能出現(xiàn)的結(jié)果是,其2031年10月的市值與今天相同。在這種情況下,特斯拉的市盈率會低得多,因為它不會接近前兩個例子中假設(shè)的增長。但假設(shè)其市盈率大約在25倍左右。到2031年,特斯拉仍然需要每年賺320億美元才能達(dá)到今天的售價。僅僅持平就需要將利潤擴(kuò)大10倍,即每年25%左右。

這種新的過度樂觀主義使特斯拉對投資者來說進(jìn)退維谷。盡管故事聽起來很棒,愿景很迷人,首席執(zhí)行官是個超級巨星,但最終,重要的是數(shù)字。從數(shù)字來看,發(fā)財?shù)臋C(jī)會流向了那些在幾年前買入的人,并很有可能使大批新的買進(jìn)者失望。(財富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:郝秀

審校:汪皓

在資本市場的史冊中,牛市從未使人們像對去年特斯拉股價的大幅上漲(相對其規(guī)模來說)一樣,對公司未來業(yè)績的期望如此之高。您是否相信,自2020年10月初以來,該電動汽車制造商的大膽創(chuàng)新計劃實際上要求其創(chuàng)造1,000億美元的額外利潤,克服其一年前所面臨的困難(那時其市值低得多),并在未來十年為投資者提供可觀的回報?長期以來,特斯拉的問題在于,即使它取得了輝煌的成功,它也永遠(yuǎn)無法以驚人的表現(xiàn)為股東冒著最大風(fēng)險下的賭注提供回報,因為它的估值太高了。即使經(jīng)歷了年中的大幅下跌之后,購買特斯拉股票仍不劃算,但新的股價猛漲起著決定性的作用。其實質(zhì)上保證了它的超級粉絲對這個偉大的公司定價過高,且定價過高的程度如此之大,以至于特斯拉股票成為一項糟糕的投資。

2020年10月7日——正好一年前——特斯拉股價收于425美元。由于其大約發(fā)行10億股股票,就像今天一樣,因此其市值達(dá)4,250億美元。我們假設(shè),投資者和基金希望每年獲得10%的回報,以彌補(bǔ)特斯拉股價的極端波動性,以及其太陽能和電池業(yè)務(wù)極有可能無法提供使其盈利能力超過任何汽車制造商所需的額外收益的情況。由于特斯拉不支付股息,且可能需要保留其所有收益,以實現(xiàn)高速增長,因此所有的收益將不得不源自股票價格的不斷上漲。從一年前來看,如果特斯拉的股價在接下來的10年里上漲160%,達(dá)到1,105美元,那么它的回報率就可能突破10%大關(guān)。我們再假設(shè),即使在一個快速增長期之后,投資者仍然會將特斯拉評價為“超速駕駛者”,并授予它30倍的溢價/市盈率。由此簡單計算可得,十年后,它需要每年賺370億美元。

簡單來說,我們假設(shè)特斯拉的起始利潤與上一季度按年率計算的利潤相同,大約為30億美元(減去出售即將到期的碳排放信用額度所得的收入,并調(diào)整稅率)。為了達(dá)到這個目標(biāo),特斯拉的利潤需要每年增長28%左右。在這種“成功”取得利潤的情況下,它在這10年的收益將達(dá)1,480億美元。每年,特斯拉需要創(chuàng)造比盈利頗豐的美國銀行(Bank of America)多三分之一的利潤,但是該利潤仍遠(yuǎn)低于微軟(Microsoft)或蘋果(Apple)創(chuàng)造的數(shù)額。

特斯拉最近的反彈大大提高了這個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。10月7日,該公司股價自2月份以來首次突破800美元,使其估值飆升至8,000億美元。現(xiàn)在特斯拉必須跑得更快才能取得同樣的兩位數(shù)回報率。其市值仍需從高得多的基數(shù)上調(diào)160%,2031年10月達(dá)到2.1萬億美元(股價為每股2,100美元)。以相同的30倍的溢價倍數(shù)計算,其利潤將達(dá)到700億美元。這比微軟當(dāng)下賺得的(620億美元)還要多,且相當(dāng)于蘋果過去四個季度利潤的80%(868億美元),這是一家非政府贊助的市場參與者有史以來的最高利潤總額。一路走來,特斯拉的利潤將從我們的30億美元基數(shù)每年增長37%。這比一年前其市值為4,250億美元時的28%的增長要求快了整整9個百分點。

特斯拉將需要創(chuàng)造總計2,480億美元的凈收入。這比去年的1,480億美元高出三分之二?,F(xiàn)在特斯拉必須比去年10月的盈利額多賺1億美元才能奪冠。即使特斯拉一舉奪魁,超越所有其他汽車制造商,對特斯拉的投資也不會得到回報,而且?guī)缀跛懈邇r股票都是如此。

事實上,更有可能出現(xiàn)的結(jié)果是,其2031年10月的市值與今天相同。在這種情況下,特斯拉的市盈率會低得多,因為它不會接近前兩個例子中假設(shè)的增長。但假設(shè)其市盈率大約在25倍左右。到2031年,特斯拉仍然需要每年賺320億美元才能達(dá)到今天的售價。僅僅持平就需要將利潤擴(kuò)大10倍,即每年25%左右。

這種新的過度樂觀主義使特斯拉對投資者來說進(jìn)退維谷。盡管故事聽起來很棒,愿景很迷人,首席執(zhí)行官是個超級巨星,但最終,重要的是數(shù)字。從數(shù)字來看,發(fā)財?shù)臋C(jī)會流向了那些在幾年前買入的人,并很有可能使大批新的買進(jìn)者失望。(財富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:郝秀

審校:汪皓

In the annals of capital markets, a bull run has never raised expectations higher for a company's future performance—relative to its size—than Tesla's rampage in the past year. Would you believe that the EV maker's moonshot since early October 2020 virtually mandates that it deliver $100 billion in additional profits, over and above the hurdle at its much lower price a year ago, to hand investors a decent return in the decade ahead? Tesla’s problem has long been that even if it succeeds brilliantly, its valuation was so gigantic that it could never perform stupendously enough to reward shareholders for making the riskiest of bets. After a stiff decline in midyear that still made it far from a good buy, its new leap is the clincher. It virtually guarantees that its superfans have overpriced a great company to the point where it makes for a bad investment.

On Oct. 7, 2020—exactly one year ago—Tesla closed at $425, and since it had about 1 billion shares outstanding, just as today, its market cap stood at $425 billion. Let's assume that folks and funds want a 10% annual return to compensate for Tesla's extreme volatility, and for the excellent possibility that its solar and battery businesses won't deliver the extra juice needed to make its profitability multiples that of any carmaker ever. Since Tesla doesn't pay a dividend and will probably need to retain all of its earnings to grow at a rubber-burning clip, all of the gains would have to come from a rising stock price. A year ago, Tesla could have hit the 10% mark if its stock rose 160% to $1,105 over the following 10 years. Let's also assume that even after a huge growth phase, investors would still rate Tesla a speedster and award it a premium price/earnings multiple of 30. By simple math, it would need to be earning $37 billion a year a decade hence.

To keep it simple, we'll assume that Tesla starts with the same approximately $3 billion profits that it posted on an annualized basis in the past quarter (subtracting sales of regulatory credits that will expire soon, and adjusting the tax rate). To hit the target, Tesla would need to grow its profits around 28% a year. In that "success" scenario, its earnings over those 10 years would amount to $148 billion. On an annual basis, Tesla would need to make about one-third more than highly profitable Bank of America garners today, but far less than the numbers posted by Microsoft or Apple.

Tesla’s recent rebound has enormously raised that bar. On Oct. 7, its shares crossed $800 for the first time since February, hiking its valuation to $800 billion. Now Tesla must race far faster to capture the same double-digit trophy. Its cap would still need to wax by 160% from a much higher base, reaching $2.1 trillion in October 2031 (at a share price of $2,100). At the same premium multiple of 30, its profits would hit $70 billion. That's more than Microsoft ($62 billion) makes today and equals 80% of Apple's profits over the past four quarters ($86.8 billion), the highest total ever recorded by a non-government-sponsored player. Along the way, Tesla's earnings would be growing from our $3 billion base by 37% a year. That's a full nine points faster than the 28% requirement when its market cap was $425 billion 12 months ago.

Along the way, Tesla would need to generate $248 billion in total net earnings. That exceeds last year's $148 billion bogey by two-thirds. Now Tesla must make $100 million more to sweep the prize than the winning number last October. An investment in Tesla won't pay off even if it laps the field of all the other automakers, and just about every high-flier.

In fact, a more likely outcome is that its market cap is the same in October 2031 as it is today. In that case, Tesla's P/E would be much lower because it wouldn't be nearly the grower posited in our two earlier examples. But say its multiple stood at around the market average of 25. Tesla would still need to be making $32 billion a year by 2031 to be worth what it's selling for today. Just flatlining would require expanding profits 10-fold, or around 25% a year.

The new over-over-optimism has put Tesla in a no-win bind for investors. The story sounds great, the vision is enthralling, the CEO is a superstar. But in the end, it's the math that counts. And the math says that the bonanza went to those who bought in years ago—and promises disappointment for the legions of new believers.

財富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為財富媒體知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章
兴业县| 阿勒泰市| 广宁县| 抚远县| 峨山| 探索| 大庆市| 浦江县| 乃东县| 乐业县| 原阳县| 嘉禾县| 玉环县| 凭祥市| 子长县| 邻水| 大兴区| 平和县| 离岛区| 永和县| 策勒县| 灌阳县| 西吉县| 延吉市| 贺兰县| 仪陇县| 潍坊市| 通许县| 英超| 普宁市| 儋州市| 邮箱| 盐池县| 临泽县| 文化| 咸丰县| 洛扎县| 云梦县| 兴安县| 内乡县| 鹤山市|