Siri補(bǔ)考有進(jìn)步
|
????蒙斯特同時(shí)還報(bào)道了Google Now的表現(xiàn)。Google Now是谷歌（Google）開發(fā)的旨在與Siri競爭的產(chǎn)品?？傮w而言，Siri的表現(xiàn)稍好一點(diǎn)，如上面的柱狀圖所示。但是，每個(gè)程序都有自身的優(yōu)勢和不足。 ????蒙斯特寫道：“Siri最大的優(yōu)勢在于本地查找和操作系統(tǒng)命令，最大的弱點(diǎn)是電子商務(wù)和信息。而對于谷歌，不出所料，導(dǎo)航和信息是它的強(qiáng)項(xiàng)，而電子商務(wù)同樣較弱。Google Now在操作系統(tǒng)命令方面也有許多不足。例如，通過Siri可以完全控制音樂應(yīng)用程序，但Google Now理解不了歌曲變換/暫停命令。我們相信，谷歌未來一定會(huì)加強(qiáng)控制操作系統(tǒng)的能力。在電子商務(wù)領(lǐng)域，我們認(rèn)為上述兩種解決方案都不夠好?！?/p> ????下面是蒙斯特給出的Siri與Google Now的對比圖。 ???? |
????Munster also reported on the performance of Google Now, Google's (GOOG) answer to Siri. Overall, Siri did slightly better, as the bar chart at right shows. But each program has its strengths and weaknesses. ????"Siri's biggest strengths," Munster writes, "are in local discovery and OS commands. Siri's biggest weaknesses are in commerce and information. For Google, unsurprisingly, navigation and information are its strongest points, while commerce was weaker. Google Now also was significantly weaker in OS commands. For example, Siri enables full control of the music application via Siri, but Google Now does not understand all song change/pause commands. We believe Google will eventually strengthen its ability to control the OS in future launches. Commerce was an area in which we viewed both solutions as weak." ????Below: Munster's side by side comparison. |
|
????譯者：項(xiàng)航 |
|
最新文章