国产一精品一AV一免费,亚洲成AV人片不卡无码,AV永久天堂一区二区三区,国产激情久久久久影院


 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
Google woos publishers from Apple with 10% One Pass cut
作者: Seth Weintraub    時間: 2011年02月18日    來源: 財富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:專欄         
字體 [   ]        
打印         
發(fā)表評論        





????As Apple deals with a publisher backlash from its subscription plan offering, Google swooped in today to offer publishers a less expensive alternative that will work on more devices.

????Originally leaked last June as 'NewsPass' by an Italian newspaper, Google (GOOG) released details on its new One Pass publishing tool today. The timing is no coincidence as Apple (AAPL) is currently dealing with a publisher backlash over its newly-enforced 30% cut of publisher revenues in its popular App Store.

????Google is undercutting Apple and only taking 10% of the revenues across the board, according to a Google spokesperson.

????Although additional details are scant, the service portends to give publishers the choice of how they want to publish their work and what they want to charge. Google lists the following bullet points:

????? New revenue stream

????? Purchase-once, view-anywhere functionality

????? Ability to give access to existing subscribers

????? Lightweight technology implementation

????? Business model flexibility (e.g., subscriptions, day passes, metered access, pay-per-article, multi-issue packages)

????From the looks of One Pass, it isn't fully baked. Clicking on the "Sign Up" box sends me to a random help page. Clearly, Google is trying to take advantage of Apple's moves, but it appears to be moving a little too fast, if the signup function isn't even working yet. (Hey guys, try using a Google Docs form!)

????However, Google already has some big publishers signed up, including Bonnier/Popular Science, Media General, Inc., and Rust Communications/Southeast Missourian.

????I like this model much better than Apple's, which only works in one store on only Apple's devices. With Web/HTML5, publications can publish once and their content is instantly available on all platforms, including Apple's iOS devices. Publishers also get to keep a much larger portion of their revenues.

????The devil, however, will be in the details as we see what kind of product publishers can put out. HTML5 isn't as modern a framework for graphic design so it will be interesting to see what kind of visual experience Google can provide. We've already seen beautiful periodicals built for Apple's iPad and Google is traditionally light on its graphic interface capabilities.

????Google also offers to share customer information with publishers (but they say an opt-out exists), something Apple has promised not to do in its App Store.




相關(guān)閱讀
用戶名: 密碼:      匿名


0條評論          查看更多評論











商城县| 苍山县| 清原| 满洲里市| 类乌齐县| 长沙市| 岐山县| 丰宁| 永胜县| 无锡市| 清原| 遵义县| 元江| 磐安县| 浪卡子县| 金川县| 和平区| 方城县| 安吉县| 于田县| 双辽市| 洱源县| 牟定县| 聊城市| 瑞昌市| 余姚市| 合川市| 娄烦县| 涿州市| 岳池县| 巴塘县| 弥渡县| 满洲里市| 博兴县| 岐山县| 和平区| 攀枝花市| 洪洞县| 兴业县| 句容市| 瑞丽市|