????2013款克萊斯勒200/道奇鋒哲

????自這兩輛車(chē)2011年上市以來(lái)，有關(guān)這對(duì)難兄難弟的批評(píng)之聲就一直不絕于耳。人們說(shuō)：它們是基于差勁的動(dòng)力系統(tǒng)打造的過(guò)時(shí)車(chē)型了。Edmunds.com的評(píng)論是：“要為克萊斯勒200說(shuō)句好話真難?！薄断M(fèi)者報(bào)告》說(shuō)：“鋒哲和它的同門(mén)克萊斯勒200一樣，就是一款過(guò)氣的、沒(méi)水準(zhǔn)的車(chē)型，在家用轎車(chē)?yán)锖翢o(wú)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力可言?！盓dmunds.com還說(shuō)：“我們還是認(rèn)為，大多數(shù)消費(fèi)者如果要買(mǎi)新的家用轎車(chē)，最好是去看看其他品牌。因?yàn)殇h哲的大多數(shù)對(duì)手，不管是進(jìn)口的、還是國(guó)產(chǎn)的，內(nèi)飾要比它好得多，整體做工要強(qiáng)得多?！泵髂昴瓿跞驴巳R斯勒200將會(huì)量產(chǎn)，但最新消息稱(chēng)，鋒哲還是會(huì)保持自己的老樣子，打算一直混到2015年。

????2013 Chrysler 200/Dodge Avenger

????The chorus of criticism for these two garage mates has been consistent since they were introduced in the 2011 model year: They are aging designs built around substandard powertrains. Edmunds.com: "It is hard to make a case for the Chrysler 200 sedan."Consumer Reports: "The Avenger, like the related Chrysler 200, is an outdated and outclassed design that is uncompetitive among family sedans." Edmunds.com again: "We still think most consumers will be better off looking elsewhere for their next family sedan, as the majority of the Avenger's rivals, both imported and domestic, offer superior interior designs and a higher level of overall refinement." An all-new Chrysler 200 goes into production early next year, but the latest reports have the Avenger hanging around in its current configuration into 2015.