????不過(guò)說(shuō)到底，不管你是偶然進(jìn)入Twitter的Instagram用戶，還是只瞄一眼Instagram照片的Twitter用戶，或者同時(shí)是這兩家的忠實(shí)用戶，在這場(chǎng)完全出于企業(yè)私利、針尖對(duì)麥芒的“雙敗”交戰(zhàn)中，你很難不感覺(jué)自己也是個(gè)輸家。比如說(shuō)，我就不想在用Twitter時(shí)還得點(diǎn)擊一個(gè)鏈接才能看到本來(lái)在一個(gè)網(wǎng)站上就能看到的照片。不管這場(chǎng)斗爭(zhēng)是誰(shuí)的過(guò)錯(cuò)引起的，它都只讓普通用戶的體驗(yàn)變得更糟糕了（見(jiàn)鬼的是，就連希斯特羅姆自己也表示，這種變化可能對(duì)用戶來(lái)說(shuō)“確實(shí)讓人困惑”）。

????所以說(shuō)，在Twitter推出據(jù)說(shuō)類似Instagram的功能，以及Instagram推出自己的大規(guī)模網(wǎng)站戰(zhàn)略前，我們只會(huì)看到事態(tài)變得更熱鬧。至于說(shuō)受害最深的群體，顯然不是Twitter或Instagram自己，而是廣大用戶。

????譯者：清遠(yuǎn)

????But ultimately, whether you're an Instagram user who dips into Twitter, a Twitter user who just skims Instagram photos in their streams, or an avid user of both, it's hard not to feel like the loser in this none-too-subtle vitriolic exchange where features are crippled for purely selfish enterprise reasons. I, for one, don't want to use Twitter and have to click on a link to another site to look at a photo I once could have viewed on the site. Regardless of whose fault that is, it makes for a poorer experience. (Heck, even Systrom has said the change may be "really confusing" to users.)

????So until Twitter rolls out that purported Instagram-like feature, and Instagram sorts out its big online web push, expect things to possibly get even more heated. And who suffers the most -- certainly not Twitter or Instagram -- but users.